Archive for the ‘Maze Hill’ Category

Parklets Hiding in Plain Sight (4)

Friday, May 17th, 2013

Haven’t had one of these for ages, so I thought I’d go with a parklet that looks much smaller than it actually is today.

It’s in the area just north of Maze Hill station, around Tyler Street/ Walnut Tree Road (which is bisected by it) and Columb Street and manages to encompass open grassland, mature trees and a kiddies playground in an area that in my memory at least is always teeny.

It’s clearly the result of bomb damage and what has always amazed me is that there is a park there at all; that the whole of it wasn’t just subsumed into new builds. I am sure it would be now.

I was curious to know just which bombs it might have been, so I enlisted the help of resident Phantom Blitz Expert, Stepen Hunnisett, who gave me a rundown of just how flattened the area had got by the end of World War II:

  • 8/9/1940 (no time given) – Tyler Street/Trafalgar Row – High Explosive /Incendiary Bombs – Fire at Francis Campion’s premises
  • 17/10/40 @ 16:58 – 16-18 Tyler Street – High Explosive Bomb – no casualties
  • 10/01/41 @ 00:15 – Tyler Street – numerous Incendiary Bombs – no casualties
  • 8/9/40 no time given – Maze Hill Station – Incendiary Bombs on line
  • 9/9/40 no time given – 99 Maze Hill – Incendiary Bomb – fire in house
  • 9/9/40 @ 23:11 – 111 Maze Hill – Incendiary Bomb – fire in house
  • 9/9/40 @ 23:15 – Maze Hill Station – Incendiary Bomb on down line
  • 17/10/40 @ 17:20 – 75 Maze Hill – High Explosive – no casualties
  • 18/10/40 @ 23:59 – 139 Maze Hill – High Explosive – 1 walking casualty
  • 18/10/40 @ 09:19 – Maze Hill Station – 2 Delayed Action Bombs discovered in Goods Yard
  • 18/10/40 @ 10:12 – 37 Maze Hill – UXAA Shell
  • 20/10/40 @ 22:50 – 139 Maze Hill (again) – High Explosive Bomb

Blimey – after that little lot it’s hardly surprising there’s so much post-war new-build. Of course they were aiming for (among other things) the railway line – and sometimes actually hit it – but it’s clear living round Maze Hill in 1940 was a dangerous occupation.

The area is still pretty darn cute (I’ve always loved Walnut Tree Road) but it must have been even cuter before 1940. Still – respect to whoever decided not to cover every single inch with what must have been much-needed housing and instead pay attention to the social needs of the people who were going to live in the new homes.

If you’d like to know more about wartime Greenwich and Blackheath, Stephen has two of his occasional Blitzwalks coming up. The first is this Sunday, May 19th,  at 11.00am, the second, unusually, on a Friday 28th June at 6.30 p.m.

Both walks meet outside All Saints Church, Blackheath Village, cost £9 per head and last 2 hours 45 minutes. You can pay on the day but pre-booking is strongly advised as they’re always popular, via the website.

 

1958 Maze Hill Train Crash

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

There’s a photo in David Ramzan’s Greenwich – Centre of the World that has always fascinated me. I’d show it to you but I don’t know whose it is and I do at least try to keep the goody-two-shoes side of copyright. If you have the book it’s sandwiched between pages 100/101 and it’s an absolute must-see if you live around Maze Hill.  The reason why I’m talking about it today is  that Joe reminded me about it and it occurred to me that fifty-three years ago today, despite a  major train crash yesterday, commuters would have been travelling into London as normal – something I doubt would happen nowadays. UPDATE: The photos in this have been sent to me by Stephen. I believe they’re from the fabulous Greenwich Heritage Centre, but if they’re not apologies to all. Anyone who objects, just let me know and I’ll take ‘em down. Note – neither of these is the one in David Ramzan’s book – which is still really worth a look.

The Maze Hill train crash occurred when the 9.41am, electric four-coach passenger train from Gravesend, heading towards Charing Cross, missed the red danger signal and collided, head-on, with an empty 9-coach steam train that was being shunted into the sidings (yes, Maze Hill had sidings in the 1950s – and not only sidings, but a large engine shed, too.)

There were no fatalities, happily, but 43 of the 50 passengers went to hospital, though ultimately none of them were seriously injured.

Joe found the accident report online and I’ve been having a read of it, and what fascinates me most is the speed with which the incident was dealt.  You can see a close-up of the worst damage here though the photo in David Ramzan’s book, taken, I assume from the bridge, or perhaps the nurses’ home, shows the whole thing, in fantastic detail – from the gawping onlookers to the stopped traffic. It also shows a view of Maze Hill now totally lost. worth seeing as much for the background as the incident itself.

But back to the timings.  The report says that the accident happened at 10.25am. A fleet of ambulances was on scene ten minutes later. All casualties were removed to hospital by 11.15am. Breakdown cranes were ordered and – get this – both railway tracks were reopened at 7.45pm that evening. They took just nine and a half hours to remove not only an electric train but a walloping great iron steam locomotive too.

I can’t see South Eastern beating that. Okay,  I guess the forensics-gathering these days would take ages, but, given the evidence given to the enquiry (which was also complete just before Christmas that year) I’m not sure what else they would have needed to glean. They ascertained the morning was clear and the rails were dry, that both trains were in working condition, as were the signals. Everyone, from the Stationmaster and Signalman down to the temporary porter (porters at Maze Hill!) was interviewed, as were linemen, firemen, maintenance men, inspectors, Uncle Tom Cobbley and all.

It appears, (despite a reprimand to the guard, who ‘failed to keep a good look out when leaving Westcombe Park’), to all have been down to the poor old driver running the electric train, one P. W. Hurst. Thirty three years old and with a previously clear 17-year record on the railways, popular, well-balanced both physically and mentally, Hurst, it would seem, simply missed the signal.

Poor P. W Hurst’s worst-day-ever is recounted in detail in the report, from his bedtime Ovaltine and biscuits the night before to his cooked breakfast at Dartford motorman’s lobby the next day; from his diligent testing of the brakes at Slade Green through to his frantic release of the dead man’s handle when he suddenly realised he had missed the signal and was heading straight for a steam loco.  I can’t imagine his thoughts as he found himself hurtling towards it. After the crash the poor guy had to climb out through a window onto the wreckage, amazingly with just a few cuts and scratches.

Five months later at the Old Bailey he was tried on charges of endangering the safety of passengers by wilfully neglecting to conform to signals. His daily habits were probed – pipe, very little alcohol – but he did own a TV set, which he occasionally watched with his wife. As I read the report I found myself really feeling for him. Perhaps the judge did too – his previous good conduct , passion for the railways and special commendation two years previously for preventing an accident were taken into account, and he was found Not Guilty and acquitted. at testament to the edict that Accidents Will Happen.

If you get a chance to look at the report, don’t miss the back page, which has a diagram of the station at Maze Hill, complete with what I count as nine sidings, both North and South. No prizes for guessing what happened to them.

Mays, Mayes, Maize, Maze Hile, Hill

Friday, August 15th, 2008

Jo asks:

“Why is Maze Hill called so – presumably there was a maze since that would be in keeping with the royal park etc.”

The Phantom Replies:

The answer to this is not at all straightforward – and it’s not necessarily correct either. It doesn’t help that it’s not always been spelled like that. Over the centuries it’s been spelled using all the versions in the title.
According to my trusty Hasted, it is “supposed to have taken its name from Robert May who lived, 1683, in Park Wall, now Park Terrace.” He got his information from the court rolls of Westcombe. Gregory Page – who is better known for his developments at more central Blackheath – is listed in 1717 as living in Mayeshile.
As an aside, I was chatting with a friend the other day who’s studying old manuscripts for a PhD, who told me that what we think of as ‘quaint,’ archaic spelling on old documents was actually deliberate – that the authors of documents knew full-well that they were spelling things differently every time and that being able to spell words in ingenious ways was considered a mark of education and sophistication – which would explain why things are sometimes spelled – in our eyes awry – several times in the same document. I have no idea if it’s true, but it certainly sheds a different light on old manuscripts…
But back to the Mays. Turning to Neil Rhind, I read that Mays Hill would have been established by the latest, the end of the 15th Century when our old friend Humph pinched a lump of common land to build his own palace – and Maze Hill would have been the cart track up the side of his new acquisition.

Neil Rhind seems to disagree with Hasted – in that it was named after Sir Algernon, not Sir Robert May. But far more interesting to me is the theory that there was actually a maze – albeit rather a long way away. A turf maze – a bit like the one at Hall Place rather than a formal one like at Hampton Court. It was, apparently, on the site of today’s Wemyss Road – just round the corner from the main drag. It’s not really a direct route though, and it’s frankly a stretch for me – though I guess at a pinch it could commemorate the cutting of the maze…

It’s also spelled Maize Hill – though I’ve not heard that there were any plantations of corn around there in particular.

No – I’m going back to my friend’s theory in that our ancestors enjoyed the art of creativity in spelling. Mr May – whether Algernon or Robert – seems the most likely solution to me – it being originally “May’s Hill.”

I got told off for speculation yesterday and since I may as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb, I have one last thought to add. I have not heard or read this from anyone – it’s merely from my own ponderings. That since this was a pathway cutting the Park from the rest of the land and that one thing that the area was well-known for – especially in Henry VII’s time, was the abundance of May trees.

There was nothing Good King Hal and his “lusty bachelors” enjoyed more than setting off of a spring morning, and riding out towards Shooters Hill to gather may blossom, ‘ “caracolling” (I think this means singing rude songs) along the way and challenging each other to “feats of horsemanship,” according to Rev. LeStrange. Could that particular hill have enjoyed a particularly spectacular display of blossom?

I’ll be getting onto some of the intriguing buildings – and their occupants – of Maze Hill on other days…