Google  


Thursday, 31 January 2008

Aircraft

Mark asks:

Have planes been rerouted over Greenwich? I can't recall so much traffic and noise.

The Phantom replies:

I don't know about any rerouting of aeroplanes, but a friend of mine who flys helicopters tells me that this area is where they are held in a holding pattern before they're allowed to fly over Central London, which is why we get so many helicopters, chinooks etc.

There could be a little more traffic due to that crash in Heathrow a week or so ago. One of the bays is, I believe, out of action, which means more circling for waiting aircraft.

Labels:

Phantom Webmaster, P.I.

It was a January afternoon so cold it would knock the scroll out of William IV's hand. I'd been hanging around the offices of the local beak, hoping to get a tip-off that would pay the rent for the next seven days. It had been a tough week. Georgie the Ice Cream Vendor was looking at 15 years in the cooler. My best stoolie had taken a ride to Belmarsh, Shiny-Boy Stone had taken a ride to Charlton Cemetery and Yours Truly was taking a ride up Deptford Creek without a clue.

I remember the dame as if it were yesterday. I arrived back at the office soaked to the skin and shivering, my battered Homburg wetter than a Greenwich Council lapdancer-club rejection. She was silhouetted against the broken Venetian blind, all sharp suit and peek-a-boo hair. Suddenly it was August. I swallowed.

"Take a seat, Miss, er-"

"No names, Mr Webmaster. It's safer that way." Her steady gaze travelled down my kipper tie and fixed itself on the soup stain I'd hoped was hidden by the jazzy pin Johnny Rocket told me was in that season. "Tomato?"

"Mock Turtle," I brazened.

"How would you like to make it real turtle, Mr Webmaster?"

"Would you be serving it?"

Her look was ice. Back to January again. "I need to find a man, Mr Webmaster."

I ignored the obvious double entendre and cut to the chase. "Where did you last see him?"

"In a bookshop in Canterbury He wasn't looking so good."

"So. You go there, pick him up and cart him to QEH emergency room. I don't see where I come-"

"He's dead, Mr Webmaster."

Things were looking up. I smelled a job. "So you want me to find the hood who did it? I don't come cheap, I'll tell you now."

"Mr Webmaster - I've seen your tie. If you came any cheaper you'd be the architect for the Heart of East Greenwich. I need to know when he died. My associate will be pleased to pay the going rate for the information."

"And who exactly is your associate?"

"Oh Mr Webmaster, I'm sure you understand I can't reveal such -" she slipped her hand inside her purse, looked me in the eye and purred "-such sensitive information. Maybe this will help you come to a decision..."

My jaded eye scanned the wedge of notes she had pulled from the handbag, lingered momentarily on the M1911 nestled between the scarlet lipstick and powder compact, then travelled back to the cash. Enough dough for a slap-up and a marguerita at The Alamo. With a paper umbrella. And a cherry.

"You've got yourself a deal, Lady."

*


While The Phantom's gadding about Greenwich in swirling cape and mask, The Phantom Webmaster is far more likely to be spotted in a dirty mac and gum shoes, talking in pithy, hard-bolied Chandler-esque. All I did was mention I was trying to find John M. Stone, to see if I was ok to reprint his wonderful lecture notes so it would be available again, and wham. Within a couple of hours, the PW had found pretty much everything there was to know about the guy.

Scary stalker/sniffer-dog qualities aside, I'm seriously impressed. And have ascertained, thanks to TPW, that, in copyright-years at least, I'm safe to reprint. I have to do a little more sleuthing to just make sure, but in the meanwhile, both I and TPW are on the case....

The Underground Passages, Caverns &c., of Greenwich and Blackheath could well be available again soon...

Labels:

Wednesday, 30 January 2008

The Plume of Feathers

Park Vista, SE10

This must be one of the oldest pubs in Greenwich. It dates back to 1691 - I'm not sure how much of it is actually from 1691, and how much is from the refit in George III's time but it certainly looks old, with its green tiled walls and low-lying feel and what's great is that it's still a cosy, popular pub, but being set just that little bit off the tourist trail, business tends to be 90% locals despite its being opposite the Park.

Well, ok, maybe not quite opposite the Park. The Dwarf Orchard (for another day...) gets in the way, its tall sycamores (read "weed trees" but don't get me started on that one) looming over that intriguing Secret Garden wall, and keeping the Plume of Feathers' country-in-the-city feel.

Not that it always had such a grand name - it was at first, just The Feathers. It only became The Plume of Feathers in the Regency. I haven't read this anywhere, but it does occur to me that maybe it was in honour of the Prince Regent, who was also Prince of Wales. If it was it would have driven poor Caroline of Brunswick potty - she was a local and by that time very much estranged from Prince George.

The old pub's dissected by the Meridian Line - a complete coincidence since the ML is a much younger feature. I've never noticed the metal strip I hear marks it outside - I'm always too busy crashing my way towards (or from, ahem,) the low, dark door, but I shall definitely (possibly) look out for it in future.

There's a great history of the place here, so I won't bore you with any more detail and instead I'll just move onto what it's like now...

What I love about the Plume of Feathers is that it's cosy in winter and fresh in summer. I love sitting outside with friends on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Those straight, no-nonsense benches are perfect for the age and style of the pub - any other kind of seating would be wrong - and though the garden out back's lovely, I would still choose to sit on the street if there's a bench available.

Inside is like your gran's parlour. Actually, I say that, but many grans are quite funky these days. Strike that. Inside is more like one of those pubs you hope to encounter after a day's hiking on the Yorkshire Moors and that really only occur in am-dram whodunnits. Low-ceilinged, low-lit, low prices. I may be lying about the last one. Squirly, trifle-topping artex walls are covered with pictures of old Greenwich - many of the Plume itself - and strange glass cases filled with olde-worlde nonsense and which are just perfect for the situation.

Little wall-lights with tassel-trimming and thick curtains are just part of the reason I love the pub in winter, The two open fires are another part. But what I really love is the welcome. Everyone is nice (well - I've never known anything else.) The staff are friendly and chatty but not overbearing or worse, too chummy, and even if there are things 'off' the menu (a regular occurrence - it's a popular place) the way they tell you is so charming you can't be frustrated.

And that brings me to the back, restaurant area. Wooden panels and open fire, thick curtains and candlelight - winter is definitely the best time to eat here (unless it's nice enough to eat in the garden of course.) I'm told they do a mean roast, but I've not tried it. The regular menu is very good - basic, no-nonsense pub food - fish & chips, pies and "famous-burgers." The wine list is not bad, and there is plenty of real ale choice. Don't miss my favourite picture on the wall - a cartoon of the Plume including, Dionysus, Sappho, Argos, Pan and, 'customers...' Oh - and the loos have pictures of Lord Nelson and Lady Hamilton. Ahhh....

I read on one website that the Plume of Feathers has a ghost - a friendly old gent who sits in the window and raises his glass to you before disappearing. True? Who can tell. It's amazing what you see after a few glasses...

Labels: ,

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

Squeaky-Clean Phantom

Showing off a little here, guys. I've been invited to be immortalised by the British Library's web-archiving scheme - which seems pretty cool to me. It means that they take periodic 'snapshots' of the blog to save for the future.

Thing is, I have to sign (well, anonymously-sign, which I am surprised but pleased is allowed) a document to say that I either own copyright or have cleared copyright for stuff I use on the site. Most of this is easy - I write the copy and take the pictures, but I've been going through old posts removing images that might even whiff of 'copyright-iffy' and checking with odd people whose work I've used to make sure they're ok with being associated with me in the archive (for example ScaredOfChives's one-off piece about the Arsenal Football Club.) If I've missed anything do let me know.

In the meanwhile, in the future, if you send something to me, I will assume I can use it in the blog unless you say it's just for my eyes, in which case I will, of course respect your wishes.

Sorry for the dull post. It was supposed to be a "Whoo-hoo! I'm going to be in the British Library!" entry and ended up being a really tedious downer about copyright...

:-(

Labels:

Underground Greenwich (5) The Stock Well

I am probably disproportionally excited today, folks, as one particular Very Long Search has ended for me. A tiny pamphlet has just arrived by registered mail, from an obscure bookshop in god-knows-where, stiffened by a piece of broken board from some long-dead hardback, and it has quickened my heart.

Perhaps one or two of you will already have this slim volume, but judging from the fun and games I had trying to get hold of a copy, the chances are it won't be on many people's bookshelves.

The Underground Passages, Caverns &c., of Greenwich and Blackheath, is the lecture notes from a talk given by John M Stone, MA, before The Greenwich Antiquarian Society on the 26th February 1914." No prizes for guessing the content.

I'm only a few pages in but already I'm learning fabulous new stuff. Not least that it was more or less a jolly jaunt for people to ramble in and around the various conduits of Crooms Hill, Greenwich Park and pretty much everywhere else in Edwardian times - albeit coupled with an "unpleasant feeling of going down into a grave as you descend through a hole in the grass" where "many ladies visiting the place for the first time have to repress an inclination to scream..."

Oooooerrr.

I'm learning about all kinds of underground places in the area I didn't even know about but the most pressing so far ( just 7 pages in), given the imminent development in the area, is the old Stock Well. It was, of course, given the name, at the bottom of Crooms Hill, around the end of Nevada St, where it becomes Stockwell St.

This ancient well was already established in Duke Humphrey's time. Humph had to get a Royal Licence in 1434 to run a conduit from there to his new gaff in the park because it would cross under the King's Highway and there weren't any statutory rights for utilities companies to dig up roads whenever they liked in those days.

The well was, by all accounts, the principle source of water for Greenwich - it seems The Point was honeycombed with little springs which filtered down towards the river. The water was helped on its way by a conduit which twists and turns underground - but which, if you lay a plan of it on top of an Ordnance Survey map, makes sense - it follows the ancient road. (It's not, apparently, the oldest conduit in Greenwich, but I haven't read that bit properly yet. I'm like a kid in Mr Humbug's shop right now...)

There exists a rather indistinct map from 1777 that implies the position "within a foot" of a pump which was probably the Stock Well, and what John Stone says next is, I think, quite pertinent to the major development to come. He writes:

"I trust that should opportunity occur it may some day be opened up. Think what archaeological treasures may there be reposing at the bottom of the well, dropped down from the earliest days of Greenwich in the daily and hourly user of the inhabitants through many centuries, and what chapters of local history might be opened up, could they be recovered."

Now, I don't know. Nearly 100 years have elapsed since this was written - and it's possible that this has already been done. If so I haven't heard of it. Maybe someone can set me right. But if it hasn't, surely the new building around there that's just about to come would provide an excellent excuse for a dig? And I'm sure, given the amount of times Thames Water have dug and re dug that bloomin' road recently, could there be a little extra excavation next time there's a suitable hole? A Section 106 project for the new developers, perhaps?

Actually, reading on, it's possible that the pump is underneath the theatre (called The Hippodrome in 1914.) I can't quite tell. That would make it next to the old Rose & Crown and almost opposite the Spread Eagle, slightly away from where the development is due to take place. But even so, it would be worth the developers being made aware that there is a possible ancient tunnel, maybe paved and walled in brick to look out for. Since this is such an old, old part of Greenwich, perhaps they should be employing an archaeologist on site anyway.

But I digress. I am a giddy Phantom today, hardly able to concentrate for all the goodies to discover in this floppy little pamphlet.

I'm reading on with a greedy eye. Some of this stuff is eye-popping (a comment I made in jest a few weeks ago, enjoying a flippant flight of fancy, seems to be rather nearer the truth than I had originally thought...) More gems from this fantastic new (old) source another day...

Labels: , , ,

Monday, 28 January 2008

More on the Clocktower...

The latest in my quest to get buildings opened for Open House Day. I've had a reply from the guy at the Council who looks after such things, and has sent me the following:

The clock tower of Meridian House does indeed contain a viewing gallery with panoramic views .It was built (by Clifford Culpin & Partners) as part of the old town hall in 1937, seemingly for public access to view the Royal Naval College and the Thames.It must have been quite a sight with all the river traffic that existed then.

Such access ceased when the building was sold after the move by LB Greenwich to Woolwich.I saw the room in 1999 when the Greenwich Development Agency funded the repair of the clock. Following this I looked into the possibility of reviving public access but to no avail. It appeared that the room was on a sub-lease although not actually used. Access internally is an issue(I climbed in from the scaffolding!)

So. It sounds as though it's going to be a bit of a (literal) uphill struggle. But I'm not done yet. Watch this space.

Labels:

A Celebration of the Life of Joshua Beasley

I just got this from Josh's family - and thought I'd pass it on.

We would like to take this opportunity to thank all the people in the local community who helped in the search for Josh by putting up posters, distributing flyers, appealing for information, talking to friends, family, colleagues and others, or simply wishing us well.

There will be an event to celebrate Joshua’s life on Friday 29th February at Blackheath Halls, between 5pm - 7pm. This event is open to anyone who would like to come along and pay his or her respects and celebrate Joshua’s life.

The flowers we have received for Josh are greatly appreciated, however if you would like to make a lasting contribution to Josh’s memory we have chosen two charities and organised for donations to be collected and given in his name. The charities are, The National Youth Theatre and Missing People. Cheques should be made payable to ‘National Youth Theatre’ and / or ‘Missing People’. And should be sent to:

Co-operative Funeralcare
Donation for Joshua Beasley
172 Well Hall Road
Eltham
London SE9 6SR

Co-operative Funeralcare will collect and collate all donations for up to four weeks after the funeral.

With best wishes,

Paul, Ruth and Rowan
http://www.myspace.com/joshbeasleymissing

Labels:

The Blackheath Tea Hut


Or, The Phantom Jumps Down Off The Fence...

I've been meaning to write about the most controversial greasy spoon in Greenwich (well, ok, on the border) for some time, but the catalyst has definitely been Alexandra Moskalenko's documentary Tea Time, which has just come out on DVD and which will enjoy a screening at the Picturehouse on Feb 3rd.

It's a charming little docco - made by Moskalenko over four years, but actually covering the life of the hut during the span of one. What makes it such a fascinating subject is that it's open 24 hours a day, on the most windswept part of the heath, and yet it still attracts customers on a year-round, day-round basis.

And what customers. From the police and emergency services, cabbies and truckers, through bikers and carny-folk, all the way to families and tourists, this place has a little micro-community of its own. It attracts loners and insomniacs, drifters and misfits, businessmen and sharp-suits. All of whom muddle along together in that small, timeless world that a tea break provides from whatever else is going on in one's life. The film, perhaps wisely, concentrates on the human element of this South London institution, with interviews and long-shots, portraits and closeups, rather than giving us a history lesson. The music, especially, reflects this - from eerie out-of-tune pub-piano to the Ian Dury-esque At The 'Ut (you get a nice cup 'a tea...)

Perhaps it is the oddball, edgy quality of the folk who visit this funny little stall that makes 'ordinary' people like The Blackheath Society so angry about its existence. Their almost-disproportionate misgivings range from its being an eyesore, a blot on the community and a litter-magnet to being rowdy and environmentally damaging. A pick & mix shopping cart of complaints which perhaps conceal the real problem they have with such a place - that it's not 'within' Society - that it has an 'outsider' quality that can never quite be contained. A quality that lingers from the dangerous days of the Greenwich Fair, of Jack Cade's Cavern, of tumbling, and still hovers, like a slightly bad smell, whenever the circus comes to town.

What I like about this documentary is that it doesn't shy from these difficult topics. It represents the extraordinary lives of ordinary people - each has a story to tell, not least that of Nick, a regular, who, by sheer dint of personality, manages to become the central character. A damaged, almost lost soul, Nick manages to find a little stability in his world whenever he makes it up to the hut, and despite his tough appearance and sarf-London accent, slowly reveals himself to be a pussycat - an adorable figure who relies on the camaraderie of the motley characters at the tea shack to get him through a life that has seen much pain.

And that's true of all the regulars interviewed. They nearly all look menacing on the outside - some might even say hard - it's even implied that there indeed are one or two villains among them - but scratch the surface and they are charming - and articulate, too, in their own individual ways. Moskalenko has taken the time and effort to find the stories here, to imply, not lay-on thick, the personal worlds this funny little place provides a haven for.

Oddly, the hut itself is less of a character than I expected. Whether in the height of summer or under a sprinkling of snow, it's merely a meeting place for unlikely people to get together. Perhaps this is because the building itself is of a temporary nature - temporary to fit the transitory nature of the people who use it.

What impressed me most was the inclusion of Neil Rhind, of whom I am normally a HUGE fan. I adore his meticulous work, his devotion to Blackheath and its history, his detailed writing, his eloquent speaking. As the president of the Blackheath Society, he agreed to be interviewed for this film. Now this is an intelligent man. He must have known that whatever he said would make him look like a NIMBY - and he did it anyway. I admire him all the more for having the guts to do it.

That's not that I agree with him. I hear his arguments - he is big enough (and has the integrity as a historian) to admit that there has been a tea-servery (albeit not 24hrs) on the site since the reign of Charles II (indeed Moskaleko interviews an octogenarian who remembers drinking tea there in his youth) but complains that it looks appalling, creates a traffic and noise problem and is environmentally unsound. The Blackheath Society proposes, I understand from the people in this film, to spend £2m on 'improving' Blackheath - including a giant ridge of earth to disguise the A2, which would engulf the tea hut. Perhaps it's even true.

You know, I struggle to see what harm there is in this little shack. In recent years the owner's made an effort to tidy it up and pick up his litter - you'll find far more elsewhere on the heath. It's miles away from anywhere, it doesn't serve alcohol, and even the police in the film admit there's virtually no trouble. I've enjoyed a fair few cups there myself. Tuesday nights are a good time, when an entire youth club from Rochester make a pilgrimage to the shack. I haven't ever heard of any trouble from them. And I never leave without a chat with someone.

I find it quite telling that the two sides have never actually met in this dispute. And that Neil Rhind has been the only person brave enough to raise his head above the parapet. At a recent licensing hearing no other bugger turned up, so the licence went through, according to the owner. The BS gets almost apoplectic over this strange little half-world, and yet they don't actually appear to have really looked at it.

It seems to me that both sides need to move on now; to actually meet. The Blackheath Society has cash to spend, but the heath belongs to all, and that includes the people who use the hut. Surely there must be some way they can live together? Maybe the society could fork out some money to make the hut more attractive, rather than obliterating it? In return, the owners of the hut can make sure that the litter is always cleared up and that people park tidily.
One final thought, not totally disconnected. If there was to be a giant earthen ridge to shield the eye from the A2, would the Highways Agency see this as a good excuse to make it a dual carriageway? Just an idle ponder.

See Tea Time for yourself. You can buy it on DVD at the Pepys Visitor Centre (the best place I know for local history books) or, if you buy it at the 'ut itself, you get a free nice cup 'a tea with it...

Oh - and if you want a biscuit to go with it, try http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com/

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, 26 January 2008

Flying Duck Flying South for the Summer...

...well, forever, actually.

Folks, it's a lovely sunny Saturday. Wrap up and visit James and Carolyn at Flying Duck while you can. To my great misery they're getting out of Greenwich while they can, and another bit of Greenwich character is leaving us.

I adored Flying Duck; and it's weird to think it soon won't be with us, but I can see what's making them go. That effing-awful Wetherspoons, that tedious, menacing, chain-filled alleyway leading to what has to be one of London's scruffiest DLR stations - and the attendant morons who think it's ok to walk around Flying Duck scoffing chips with sauce and vinegar, fingering vintage merchandise with greasy paws and swearing loudly, which is what I encountered last time I was in there. They got chucked out, and I'm not surprised.

"That's why we're going," sighed the assistant, who got an earful of choice language as she asked them to leave - a brave move in my humble...

Everything in stock is going down in price on a daily basis. Go get yourself a memento of this fab store and wish them luck with their enterprises down in Brighton.

They're going online, too, but I can't see that it will be the same. What I loved about FDE was being able to wander round, looking at piles of stuff and finding something you didn't even know existed, let alone that you needed it.

Apparently they own the place and will rent it out only to another independent. Let's hope they find someone special.

They will be sorely missed.

http://www.flying-duck.com/HTMLs/shop/shoppage.html

Labels: ,

Friday, 25 January 2008

Greenwich Farmers' Market

Yes, you read that right.

Cheryl Cohen of the Blackheath Farmers' Market has sent me this, asking for your opinions. She writes:

We've been approached by the town centre manager in Greenwich to open a weekly Saturday farmers' market on Cutty Sark Gardens. I would love some feedback on this idea. I've suggested a Saturday so as not to clash with Blackheath. The last thing we want is to take business away from Blackheath Village on a Sunday, but I feel sure that there's room for Greenwich to have its own market to help keep local people shopping in the neighbourhood and in turn, support your local shops. Would people from East Greenwich, Charlton, Woolwich or Depford attend? Please feel free to post something about this - I'd love as much feedback as possible. If you know of any community or residents associations/groups to pass this onto please feel free.

The Phantom Replies:

Mmm. A farmers' market in Greenwich would be well-received, I'm sure. I'm not totally convinced about Cutty Sark Gardens though. You'd certainly get some good custom there, especially on a Saturday when all the tourists are there. But it's quite windswept on occasion, and sited in right in the middle, puts you directly in competition with The Creaky Shed, Drings, The Fishmonger and The Cheeseboard, not to mention the M&S next door.

Have you considered moving a little further east? If I'm totally honest, I don't know quite where - the Forum is a bit small - but there must be a good space somewhere. Over the east side, there's only really the other branch of the Fishmonger to worry about, food-wise. Since the much-lamented demise of the fruit & veg stall last year, it's been supermarkets or nothing, really (there's the odd shop that specialises in ethic-y food, but I miss the fruit & veg. There are literally hundreds of new swanky (and otherwise) flats being built on the East side just now, and virtually no food shops to support them. The new East Greenwich Traders Association is doing its best, but Trafalgar Road, apart from the odd glorious exception, is still a sorry sight.

What does everyone else think?

Labels:

Cutty Sark

Great news, folks - The Heritage Lottery Trust has earmarked £10m to conserve the Cutty Sark and bring her back into ship-shape. I am delighted - it was beginning to become a bit of a national disgrace. Now they only have to find another five million - pocket change for some wealthy benefactor, I'm sure. In the meanwhile, they can get on with work after a hiatus for the fire investigation. I understand it all kicks off again in March. You can see pictures from the conservation so far here.

Labels:

Vice-Admiral Sir Thomas Boulden-Thompson

1766-1828



I've been watching the diggery going on in the grounds of Devonport House with interest. When I first saw the workmen in there I was a bit worried that they'd discovered a nice patch of real-estate to build flats on in the middle of town (paaayyyydiiirt!) but as the weeks wore on it was clear they were just building paths. It's all been lain out there now, with baby hedges and little benches, with paths around each monument.

Personally, I always rather liked a little piece of un-worked land just there. Everything else (and now this) is so manicured that a little shaggy grass was a welcome sight - and went well with the austere building behind it. These paths feel like they're trying a bit too hard. I almost quite liked that no one was officially let in, though of course I can't have been the only one who sneaked in occasionally to view the monuments.

Does this mean that it will now be officially opened so that anyone can walk around - or is it going to be a private garden? Who can tell. For the moment those heavy iron gates are firmly locked, but that path goes right down to them. Maybe it's for show. In the meanwhile, at least it's less than impressive for their new scheme if they continue to display huge plastic banners advertising cheap conference facilities...

But once more I'm digressing. I've been looking into a few of the remaining memorials in the grounds and, if you recall, the one that's been bugging me most has been the broken column...

I used to have a book about Victorian Funerary Symbolism (a remainder-shop-lovely, which I stupidly got rid of several culls ago. Whenever I have a book-cull, I always regret it...) which was all about the symbolism of graveyards. Ivy is the obvious one - for eternal life. Time is another biggie - scythes, hourglasses and skulls (like those splendid ones at St Nicholas in Deptford) are pretty obvious, as are sleeping babies and cherubs. I knew a broken column was hugely significant but, couldn't remember quite what it was...

Thank God for the internet. If you are of a similarly warped disposition as me, you will love this dictionary of Victorian Funerary Art - never be without it when you're walking around a graveyard again. It's an American website, but I'm pretty sure that the basics are the same - they seem to make sense.

"Column, broken: an early grief, end of life, sorrow. Life cut short too soon. May be girded with flowers. This image represents the decay. It usually represents the loss of the family head."

Trouble is, the longer I look at it, the less sure I am that it's just that. There's deffo a broken column there - but is that a flame too?

"Vessel with flame: the eternal flame or the eternal spirit of man."

...or is the whole thing covered in a cloth?

"Drapery: Drapery over anything - sorrow, mourning "

And what's with the wreath?

"Laurel wreath: is usually associated with someone who has attained distinction in the arts, literature, athletics or the military."

So who was this guy? Vice-Admiral Sir Thomas Boulden-Thompson, actually.

"Knight and baronet, and grand cross of the most honourable military order of the bath; vice-admiral of the red; treasurer of Greenwich Hospital ; a director of the chest; and a visitor of the West India Naval School."

The Annual Biography and Obituary of the Year 1828

Blimey - that sounds crusty. But a closer look at he seems rather more Master and Commander than at first appears. This is the chap described by Nelson as "an active young man,"as he fought at Santa Cruz and was injured, though not as badly as Nelson himself of course, who lost an arm.

Thompson got much more badly-injured captured by the French in a long sea battle not long after, trying to save his ship, The Leander at the Nile. The dastardly French treated them appallingly, plundering everything in sight - including the instruments of a surgeon who was in the middle of an operation. When Thompson tried to remind the French Captain of the way French prisoners were treated by the English, he merely shrugged gallic-ly. "I am sorry for it, but the French are expert at plunder..."

When Thompson was finally freed he was court-martialled for losing The Leander. I'm not sure how he managed to not only get off the charge, but get himself a knighthood in the process, but he certainly went on to have all kinds of honours bestowed on him. It was all going very well indeed.

He continued to fight under Nelson, until it all went horribly wrong at the Battle of Copenhagen, where he lost a leg. "I am now totally disabled and my life is run through, only at the age of 35," he wrote in frustration.

Well. Not quite. He may not have made it to Trafalgar, but back home his derring-do had not gone unnoticed. He was made Treasurer of the Royal Naval Hospital and became an MP. He became Director of the Chest after the death of Lord Hood.

It remains to be seen whether we'll be officially allowed in to see Vice-Admiral Sir Thomas Boulden-Thompson's tomb at closer-hand, or whether we'll have to continue resorting to the time-honoured tradition of sneaking round the back. In the meanwhile, the broken column is one of the more visible of the Devonport memorials.

More stories of obscure monuments another day...

Labels: , ,

Thursday, 24 January 2008

Rock Acts at Borough Hall

Ellen asks:

I work for Greenwich Dance Agency which is based in the old town hall. I am currently trying to compile a brief history of all the artists who have performed here over the years, we have heard rumours that ‘The Who’, ‘Slade’ and ‘The Rolling Stones’ have all performed here at some point. However beyond the Rolling Stones we have had very little luck in finding any information on anything to do with this building, and I was wondering whether you knew of any place I could look to find information on the building and who has performed here.

The Phantom replies:

I've been wanting to review GDA for some time, but never manage to get to sign up for taster-type classes before they're full up. You must be doing something right to get full so quickly...

I would say your first stop would be the Borough Museum at 232 Plumstead High Street, London SE18, Plumstead (no website that I can find.) It's a trip from Central Greenwich but not a total pain in the arse and presumably you're super-fit for the shortish walk from the station. I'm not sure exactly where the council keeps its archives for social stuff like what went on at the Borough Hall, but I'm betting the people there would know. Old playbills, listings and ephemera may well be available, but not on show, so it's worth asking. People who work in these places tend to be very enthusiastic about projects like yours, so do involve them in your search.

If this throws up a blank, try the Heritage Centre at the Arsenal. Again it's a bit of a bloomin' faff to get to on public transport, but not a total headache, and again the folk there are very helpful.

Going slightly higher up the a-bit-too-much-like-hard-work list, there's a small possibility that the archives of the Theatre Museum will have something.

Depending on how keen you are to get this info together, there is another option, but now we really are talking pain-in-the-arse. The British Newspaper Library at Colindale is a right-royal day (or several week's) trip. Most of it's on microfiche, which you have to scroll through for hours on end (unless it's changed since I last went - perhaps they've put it all on computers now...) Even working out which newspapers you need will be a bit of a pain in the proverbial, although you can probably narrow down the search by collaborating with the museum guys and finding out which newspapers would have carried adverts, listings or reviews.

This could turn into a seriously good project - a labour of love - I'm not saying you'll get a best-selling book out of it, but you may well find that just making a list of famous acts who've played there isn't enough to slake your thirst for information. If it were me (and to be honest I'm glad it's not - I procrastinate far too much already) I'd be looking at including it in a more general history of the Borough Hall, including an overview of what goes on there today as well as finding out about some of the smaller acts, too, then doing an ask for people who attended events there, and getting some memories from them. For that I would suggest Blackheath's excellent Age Exchange Reminiscence Centre - they may also hold archives, but have a huge amount of material and access to interesting people with something to say.

Once you have some of the names, it's worth a call to the fan clubs to see if they have any memorabilia. You can try the managements too - if the band's big enough they may have an archive section (god, that really does make these old rock dinosaurs crusty, doesn't it...) but I'm betting that the fans will be far more entertaining - and passionate.

I think this could make a fascinating book. I'd buy it...

Labels:

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

Joshua Beasley

Folks - I have sad news. Josh's body has been found in the river Thames. He appears to have drowned, and there are no obvious signs of foul play.

This is one of the saddest things I have heard in a long time. At just 17, he had his whole life ahead of him. My heart goes out to Ruth and Paul today - and to all Josh's friends who have been searching so hard for him.

Labels:

LiveJournal Syndication

Sarah asks on another thread:

Just wondering, is there a way to subscribe to your feed back on Livejournal, so I can read it on my Friends page?

The Phantom replies:

The Phantom Webmaster has kindly set up a feed for Livejournal people, which I thought I'd share - the following means nothing to me, but I assume that if you're an LJ regular you will know what it is:

Username: Phantomg

Labels:

Greenwich Gardeners' World


Jen asks:

I can't wait for Spring when I can get out into the garden and see green again. I'd thought it would be nice to try making a 'Greenwich Garden' with influences from the area's history. Any suggestions?

The Phantom rubs hands with glee and replies:

What a great question. Spring is definitely champing at the bit now, isn't it. I like the idea of a themed garden. Hope you put one in the front too so we can all enjoy it. If it's especially good, I'll feature it as one of the Phantom's Favourite Gardens...

You don't say how large your space is. For pure fantasy reasons I'm going to assume it's huge; you can always scale-down if yours is more of the average size in Greenwich - i.e. tiny.

For a really large garden (and I know some people do have them - my greedy eye lasciviously sweeps the property sections every week - the words "120-ft garden" makes my heart leap...) a sweet chestnut would be a wonderful thing, reminiscent of the fabulous old trees planted by Le Notre (well, one of his flunkys, obviously) during the redesign of Greenwich Park in the 17th Century. These beautiful trees were a passion, nay, an obsession with John Evelyn, who used to take them round to friends houses in his one-man campaign to get a chestnut in every garden.

A friend of mine (with no previous gardening experience, and who lives in a high-rise) has recently heavily got into bonsai which got me to thinking about trying to create a compromise with trees for people who like trees but only have handkerchief gardens. A giant flower pot, a small tree and some careful pruning of both roots and branches each year could surely create a lovely specimen plant - fine for a centerpiece. If you don't fancy chestnuts, perhaps a grand old oak, like the one Elizabeth I sat and Henry VIII frolicked under.

If you want fruit, how about a medlar or a mulberry tree? These wonderful old plants can both be found in the back garden at Trinity Almshouses, and there are mulberries in Sayes Park (the sorry site of John Evelyn's gaff) and right by Inigo Jones's loo at Charlton House. You can't eat medlars until they're 'bletted,' (read 'rotten') by which point you wouldn't actually want to eat them but they make tasty jam and pie fillings. Mulberries are fiddly to pick but also make good preserves and tarts.



Right. Onto flowers. Some tulips, perhaps, to remind us of the Tulip Staircase at The Queen's House? Or daffodils, for the yellow carpets of them that grow in stiff rows outside the house in spring? My faves are the ones that grow up the hill leading to the Observatory, though I'm also rather fond of the handful of naturalised crocuses that spatter the grass near the Pepys Centre.

Bela Court was originally part of Duke Humphrey's masculine stronghold, but it was made all pretty and girly by Margeurite of Anjou who decorated everything from stained glass windows to tiles with daisies (her flower) and planted bowers of various blooms. She begrudgingly included a few hawthorn buds for her estranged husband.

Henry VIII liked masques. On one occasion, he used a dancefloor which had a cloth lain on it embroidered with gold lilies. Other popular medieval/ Tudor flowers you could consider are gillyflowers, or "Sops-in-wine," used to flavour drinks with their clove-like perfume. They're better known to us as carnations. There exists a charming painting of Elizabeth Woodville surrounded by gillyflowers and the ubiquitous roses.

On the subject of roses - you could always go to Rangers House for inspiration:



or get a variety with a good name. Rosa Christopher Marlowe might be a nice choice if you're more over the Deptford side.

Georgian Greenwich is a bit more difficult. Rococo in small gardens has to be done with care or it starts to look cheap, however much cash you lay out. In the meanwhile, take a peek at the back of the Fan Museum for a very English take on the Oriental style which was also popular. I love the detail which isn't always obvious at first. There's an even more impressive one at the Pagoda in Blackheath which opens for charity occasionally. But by then, it was nudging into the Regency, and everything had softened a bit so you can get away with a lots of flowers too.

If your place is Victorian (and odds-on in Greenwich it will be) you can have great fun. They went absolutely berserk. The fabulous formal beds at the top of Greenwich Park are almost certainly toned-down for the modern eye - nineteenth century fashions were definitely on the gaudy side. They loved bright, acidic colours which to us are frankly a bit much. Bedding's a bit outre these days, but done well it can still be a great look expecially in front gardens which can get neglected. I'm sure the wheelbarrow of fortune will turn soon and formal beds will be back. If you fancied, you could have a fernery, or shrubbery, like the path up the west side of Greenwich Park, or even have a nice greenhouse like Colonel North's Winter Gardens at Eltham.


When it comes down to it, virtually everywhere you go in Greenwich you can be inspired by wonderful greenery. Keep an eye out and visit widely on Open Gardens Days. When you've done your Greenwich garden, do make sure you open it for charity on an occasional basis too, like this one I visited at the top of Crooms Hill last year...


Labels:

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

Lavinia Fenton

1708 - 1760

What I love about Greenwich is that whatever cliche you care to mention, we have an example of it somewhere. Lavinia Fenton is 18th Century 'actresses' personified (child prostitute to duchess with a spot of acting in between) and it's very pleasing to know that she once walked at least one or two of the streets we know today (no - not that kind of walk - by that time she was most definitely in "respectable" mode.

There is, of course, as with all stories of this nature, a questionable lineage. She was brought up by her mother's husband, but it's unlikely he was her real father - that honour probably going to a sailor (see what I mean about cliche?) called Beswick.

These were saucy days - where London was a dangerous and exhilarating world full of coffee houses, silks, satins, grand buildings - and footpads, murderers, cozeners, whores, drinking and gambling dens. She became a child prostitute (there were hundreds, perhaps thousands of filles-de-joie in those days - it's worth taking a peek at a copy of the slightly later quarter-million seller Harris's Lists of Covent Garden Ladies which was literally a catalogue of hookers - what they looked like, where they lived and what they would do, including 'specialities' of eye-popping inventiveness - any notions of genteel history fly right out of the window...) but really made her (stage) name as an actress.

As Lavinia Fenton she played Monimia in Thomas Otway's The Orphan in 1726 at the Haymarket Theatre, and then moved onto Lincoln's Inn Fields where she joined a theatre company and became quite a starlet - mainly with the gentlemen. It wasn't that she was particularly beautiful, but she was vivacious (why aren't people described as 'vivacious' any more?) had a good figure and could sing well

Her big moment came with the still-performed (though more often as the inspiration for Brecht/Weil's Threepenny Opera) Beggars Opera by John Gay. No one was interested in any of the other poor sods in the show - all the notices raved about her portrayal of Polly Peachum and she became almost synonymous with the role.

Audiences went mad, buying up all the souvenirs they could - mezzo-tint drawings, 'biographies' - and the lyrics of her songs printed on ladies fans (I wonder if they have one in the Fan Museum..?)

There was one fan in particular, of the supporter-variety, Charles Paulet, who became really obsessed. The fact that he was the 3rd Duke of Bolton probably made the attention a bit more palatable but he was hardly a catch looks-wise. Much older than her, in Hogarth's painting of a performance of the show, he is the creepy bloke watching her intently from the box in full stalker-fashion. The flesh crawls even more when you know that this particular performance was taking place in Newgate Prison.


It was the talk (though hardly scandal - everyone was at it) of the town but she knew which side her crumpets were buttered and, after several revivals of the show, she moved in with him. He married her as soon as his wife died. They had three illegitimate children.

So what's the connection with Greenwich? Well, she survived her husband and came to live at Westcombe House. This is not, of course, John Julius Angerstein's Woodlands; it was an earlier building. I think there's a painting of it in The Spread Eagle restuarant. She spent the rest of her life living grandly as a Duchess, and when she died was buried in St Alfege's Church. I'm not sure where her grave is; I assume it's in the crypt with Thomas Tallis and General Wolfe, but if anyone knows for sure, I'd like to know.

We don't have any real reminders of her in Greenwich, which is a shame - a nice statue of her as Polly Peachum would be a welcome feminine addition to a largely masculine bunch of sculptures here - but there is, inexplicaby, a Rua Lavinia Fenton in Sao Paulo and a Lavinia Fenton suite in a hotel in Basingstoke.

Labels: ,

Monday, 21 January 2008

Josh Beasley

Today marks a calendar months since Josh's disappearance and his Mum and Dad have asked me to remind you about him. As you know, he left his mates outside Greenwich Ice Rink around 5.00 Dec 24th and hasn't been seen since.

There will be an appeal this evening, between 5pm and 6.15pm at a bus stop on Romney Road, between the junction with King William Walk and the town centre.

This is gaining momentum, as all manner of well-known people have added their voices to the appeal for witnesses - from Benjamin Zephaniah, Michael Rosen and Jools Holland to MPs Bridget Prentice and Nick Raynsford.

Ruth and Paul are keen not to let anyone forget they're still looking for Josh. Any news at all will be gratefully received.

Incident room 020 8721 4868 Missing People on 0500 700700
Crimestoppers 0800 555111.

Labels:

Wooden Furniture Shops

Natasha asks:

I wonder if you can help? About 3 years ago I bought some furniture from a great little shop on the Trafalgar Road, just round the corner from Greenwich Auction Rooms. I'm sure it was called No Ikea originally but the owner was telling me he had to change the name, for fear of being sued by Ikea and he then called it No Idea. It was a small shop with another unit round the corner which sold lots of wooden furniture, very similar to Next but half the price. I'm sure when I drove past the other day it had gone. Would you know?

The Phantom replies:

Always had a big cuddly old dog outside? I think you must mean Yew Wood Knot Believe It! which used to be where the Polish Deli is now (I have vague recollections of No Idea too...) I always thought they missed another appalling tree-pun (Yew Wood Knot Be-leaf It would have done the trick.) I don't know where they've gone to, if at all, but if it's mirrors you're after, try the mirror shop on Woolwich Road just the Charlton side of the flyover. For wooden furniture. Hmm - cheap stuff, I'd say the auction itself. Stewart John Antiques do repros at more expensive rates. Or how about the furniture shop on the side of Stockwell St market? A bit more ethnic-y but certainly worth a poke around.

If you're after office-type furniture do give Greenworks a go - it's all second-hand, recovered from office-moves and redecorations and some of it's a bit scruffy, but a lot of it's hardly or sometimes never been used - they have over-orders, one-year old stuff and sometimes things like a job lot of chairs that were not quite the right shade for the interior designer's whim, so they've come, still wrapped in their original plastic, to Greenworks instead of landfill, which is where, amazingly, they used to end up.

Any of you folk got any local suggestions for alternatives to wooden IKEA stuff? BTW has anyone else noticed that IKEA has really gone downhill recently - the prices are the same but everything is just that little bit thinner/wobblier/crappier. Local alternatives are always welcome...

Labels: ,

The Iron Bridge and the Ha'penny Hatch

The Laban Centre from The Ha'Penny Hatch

The regal-sounding River Ravensbourne starts at Caesar's Well, in Keston (sorry SoC), near Bromley, but from there on, things go (literally, of course,) downhill. It's joined by the Rivers Pool and the wonderfully-named Quaggy around Catford, then becomes better known as Deptford Creek at our end. And it has always been a right-royal pain in the arse to travellers. The Romans, when marching between Londinium and the rest of the Empire had to grit their teeth and cross it - as have every other people since - it's just that bit too long to go round.

Its seen its fair share of history - not least The Battle of Deptford Bridge in 1497, part of the Cornish Rebellion, which I'll save for another day. All around this little stretch of muddy water new glories of British sea power were created, whilst old ones rotted. It was here the last vestiges of The Golden Hind, Francis Drake's ship, which after he'd circumnavigated the globe and been knighted by Queen Elizabeth on board, rotted and crumbled to their doom. We've never been able to look after famous and important ships round these parts...

Then everything changed. London's First Railway was to be between London Bridge and Greenwich (another thing for another day...) and the whole thing was coming on apace. They built the first bit relatively quickly in 1836, and the owners boasted to the press that the whole thing would be finished in three months. Then some bright spark pointed out Deptford Creek.

The big deal was that there was a Royal Palace (albeit hardly ever, if at all, used by Queen Victoria) one side of the creek, and a Royal Dockyard the other, officially created by Henry VIII. This meant there was all manner of business, and lots of travellers all around that area. Dozens of ship builders, and other services as well as the comings and goings of a busy fishing port meant that whoever looked after any crossing here was powerful indeed. The tolls charged on a little footbridge brought in about £ 350 a year.

The building of the whole section from well before Deptford Bridge right through to Greenwich was held up while railway company tried to decide whether to build over the river or tunnel under it. They liked the idea of a bridge, because they could let-out the arches underneath at a profit, although they talked more loudly about saving poor cattle who might wander onto the tracks at ground level. But the main problem was as ever - tunnelling has never been a cheap option.

The company was prevented by an Act of Parliament from building a fixed bridge unless all the companies, occupiers, quays and wharves agreed on it. This was like red rag to a bull - a great opportunity for extortion from every Tom, Dick and Harry along the shoreline, not to mention the toll-keepers, who were never going to say yes without a fight.

The railway company tried to push through an amended bill that would just require them to get the permission of 'interested parties" but no dice. The couldn't build a fixed bridge and that was that.

A swivel bridge couldn't be guaranteed strong enough, but that tunnel was still not looking any cheaper. Eventually Colonel George Thomas Landeman, who'd designed the Deptford High Street Bridge (with especially high walls so that the trains' chimneys couldn't be seen) came up with a drawbridge, but there were more delays while they waited for someone to come up with the kind of innovative machinery to make it work.

The bridge was finally complete in November 1838, a complex affair of pulleys and chains, sliding rods and counterweights, which needed eight burly blokes to operate it. Three toots of a whistle had to be sounded before it was crossed, presumably so the good folk of Deptford and Greenwich could cover their ears in readiness for the racket caused by metal on metal.


There was still the problem of the tollbridge. The way to get things done in the 19th Century seemed to be by Act of Parliament, which MUST have been a quicker affair than it is now. The tollkeepers secured a bill in 1837 where the railway company had to pay any difference between the toll company's receipts for that year and what they had earned before the bridge was built. The railway company, to offset this, was able to charge pedestrians to cross the new Ha'penny Hatch.

The first, a wooden affair that, when it was opened on Christmas Day in 1836 was used by thousands of people was quickly replaced by a simple lifting bridge.

According to the old chronicler Alfred Rosling Bennett, in 1912, there had originally been a grand, tree-lined promenade running alongside the railway on either side of the grand railway arches, also a toll road (1d per person), which The Daily Ledger declared, in 1835, would be "incomparably superior to the boulevards of Paris" appealing to "an invalid or family of children" who would be "sent daily to walk on this promenade, shaded by trees and protected by the well-regulated police of the Company," but it never really took off and was made free very quickly. I'm not sure how much, if any of it, still exists. The Ha'penny Hatch continued charging until 1901, and, from what I can tell, the old one closed in the 1920s.

The official opening of the new Ha'penny Hatch footbridge, all spruced up as part of the whole Millennium Thing, took place in 2002. There's a puff-piece created by the Environment Agency about the project here

Labels: ,

Friday, 18 January 2008

What's Going On Here?

Anon writes:

Have you heard that the John Roan school headteacher has been removed fromhis post after a vote of no confidence from the board of governors? It wouldbe great to find out why this happened....Local gossip says that the schoolhas been put in special measures.

The Phantom replies:

I haven't heard of any of this - but I confess to being up to my eyes in stuff at the moment. Does anyone else know about this?

Labels:

Thursday, 17 January 2008

Maze Hill Pottery


The Old Ticket Office, Woodlands Park Road, SE10

Once upon a time there was a little railway station. It was a fine railway station, with wide sidings and a dear little ticket office who was his best friend. But one day a wicked old wizard came along and cast an evil spell, his greedy eye on the little station's land. The little station fought and fought but the wicked old wizard's magic was too strong.

The brave little station survived but at what cost? He had lost his lovely sidings and the wizard forced him to live with an ugly hovel instead of his beloved ticket office. Only the wave of a fairy godmother's magic wand and could save the little station's friend...

Maze Hill Pottery is a wonderful example of the kind of thing we can't afford to lose in Greenwich - a sweet little Victorian building turned into something that isn't an estate agent's office or a KFC rip-off. It's run by Lisa Hammond, an internationally-acclaimed artist whose stuff is not just beautiful, it's useful too. Each item is unique and although she does do some interesting 'art' pieces, most of her stuff is actually useable. Bowls and pots, cafetieres and casseroles, each is subtley different and has a practical purpose, rather than just an ornamental dust-trap function...

As I was walking past one day in December, I saw a postcard advertising an open studio day - just the sort of thing I can't resist. Even better, it was going to coincide with a rare kiln-opening. Apparently the thing takes several nail-biting days to cool properly - if she opens the door too quickly, the contents crack. She doesn't actually know how her latest pots will turn out for some time after she's fired it all up. And since she only fires up about once a month, a bad batch can represent a real problem.

What seemed like the entire population of Greenwich turned up for the opening - let's face it, it's not the sort of thing we often get to see round here - and the tiny studio was utterly packed. As the rack was slowly winched out, the tension on Lisa Hammond's face was obvious, turning to relief as she realised that it was, after all, a good batch. Pots and plates, vases and jars, all jumbled up next to each other, filling the kiln to the last inch.

What I found delightful was the surprise Lisa Hammond still has every time she opens a kiln. She can't be sure exactly how anything will look - I didn't realise just how inexact a science slips and glazes are. And that's what makes ceramics so exciting. As she examined each piece, it was clear that even things from the same batch will be different - so every item is unique. A good thing in this age of mass-production.

Lisa Hammond exhibits all over the world, and her wares can be purchased from exclusive stores in Tokyo (though of course you could just nip into the workshop if she's in there.) It's a terrific place to get presents (it solved the problem of what to get for the Phantom-Webmaster-who-has-everything) but they don't have to be just pottery. Lisa Hammond finds time to run classes and workshops too which would also make a good 'virtual' gift. I've never been to a class, but I'm tempted. They look great fun. There's loads about them and all manner of other interesting things about the place itself on the excellent website. I won't reinvent the (potter's) wheel here by repeating what can be found at http://www.greenwichgateway.com/mazehill/index.htm

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

Ceramic Painting Shop in Nelson Road

Paul Cunningham writes:

Just look at Nelson Rd. For what should be a show piece of Greenwich Town Centre its is looking awful. Another shop has closed and in the dark nights it s quite a dismal place.

And my part in it. Well I have been trying to open a ceramic painting shop where the offer is creativity on unglazed ceramics with colours. I've had a lease conditional on a planning application since 2006!

The problem is I can't get LB Greenwich to give me a decision on the type of shop it should be. Its not that I don't like the decision its that I can't get one with a change of use planning application that been with them for six months!! They are hung up that it might be a cafe because you can have cup of tea or coffee and a juice for the kids. I need help. To try and get this matter moving and resolved I have started an online petition

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?PaulC just to urge them to give me a decision!

The Phantom replies:

This is an interesting one. Yesterday when you sent me this, I assumed that it was part of the 'regeneration' (read "chain store revolution") that seems to be lined up for Nelson Road, but I'm beginning to think that it's not as simple as that. I think it's the whole future of a shop unit, probably beyond the life of your store.

It is true that we have an inordinate amount of cafes in Greenwich already, and I can see that change-of-use could be seen as a precedent - if, for example, you opened your pottery shop and found that you made more cash just selling teas, it would then be a cafe in perpetuity - even if you sold it on. Presumably this is what the council's bothered about.

But that's no reason to keep you hanging on like this. They should make a decision - even if it's only a firm "no" - so you can get on with your life and set up shop elsewhere.

There are a couple of things I could see being a possible compromise if you can possibly get the council to talk (unlikely I know, but worth a shot.) I wonder if there could be some kind of "temporary" change of use licence - perhaps for the duration of the lease of the shop, to be reviewed at the end of a set period. If the council felt your shop was less pottery-painting and more coffee-drinking, they could kick up a fuss. If your business was thriving as a pottery paintery then it would get a permanent licence or another long-term 'temporary' change.

You could agree not to sell a certain amount of beverages or more than three different kinds of cake or something, or keep the amount of permanent cooking facilities to a kettle and a sink.

Or maybe the change of use could be granted to YOU, not the shop - so that if you moved, the change of use would not stay with the shop?

But perhaps I'm being naive. Maybe it's easier for the council to sit on the fence. Have you tried contacting your councillor?

If all else fails, what about considering other places? Ceramic-painting shops are destination stores, not depending on footfall. The ones I've seen in Brighton, for example, seem to be stuck down side-streets and still do a roaring trade. Trafalgar Road is beginning to get some interesting shops down it and as the amount of new builds increases, hopefully the area will continue to expand and trendify. The rents are cheaper too, and the choice of unit is wide indeed. I'd suggest taking a look there.

I wish you luck trying to get a decision from the council, one way or another, so you can get on with your life and your business...

I forgot to mention that Paul's website is http://www.biscuit-biscuit.com/

Labels:

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

Five-Minute Film Ideas

Mariana writes:

I am a film student and my next project is to make a 5 minutes film related to the Maritime Greenwich. I have read many interesting facts on your blog but couldn't find yet a subject for the film. Specially because it must be about the specific area between the O2 down to the Cutty Sarck, the area that goes near the river. So basically all that goes beyond (south and east) of Blackwall Tunnell Avenue, Blackwall Lane, Trafalgar Road and Romney Road is unfortunately not useful...

Anyway I wonder if you could help us. I came to you obviously because I understand you have great knowledge and information on Greenwich; perhaps you know some amazing fact on the area that I am missing out. We are researching the local but If you know a great subject that could be interesting to film is always worth to ask.

I appreciate a lot if you could take some of your time to answer me back, I guess you're probably busy. Still from the dedication you demonstrate through your blog I can only have came to the right person. And by the away I read all about the T&L's Amylum factory; It's to considerate as you post it almost an year ago so I don't know how's the situation.


The Phantom blushes and replies:

But that's a fascinating part of town! Hey - it's one of the few vestiges of Industrial Greenwich left, and even as I write this, it is being eroded. Never more did this beautiful (yes, beautiful) part of Greenwich need recording.

Take a walk along the Thames Path for starters. Check out the Foot and Mouth Memorial - do a bit of research and find out who built that piece of classic Outsider Art. There's a story there for sure. Who looks after that little garden? A five-min film about whoever that is would be charming. How about the boat repairers, just next to the Lovell's Wharf development? It's still just about there, but is being re sited, I understand, to make way for the new flats. Get out there and check those guys out. One of their patients last year was the Grand Turk, a fine tall ship.

Or, if all that isn't edgy enough, what about those creepy dead buildings a bit further up, where the path is surrounded by high corrugated iron walls both sides and it's like something out of The Long Good Friday? Or the social club of the chemical works? Do a docco about the people who frequent that place and I'll watch it. Round the back of the Dome, scrap metal yards and dodgy dealerships, strange remnants of when the Peninsula was a thriving industrial zone still linger, their high chain link fences guarded 24/7 by Alsatians that are not guys from Eastern France...

Tell us the story behind that extraordinary Victorian building next to Blackwall Tunnel - or those long thin buildings that were once Endersbys. Or the aggregates that still arrive by ship at the wharf along the way