Google  


Wednesday, 28 March 2007

Greenwich Film Unit



"Greenwich. Could be Bloody Anywhere..."















Like my suggestion for a catchy new slogan for the Greenwich "Film Unit?"


It's a funky name - no one would ever guess it was just a local government department. I wonder if the people who work there lord it over the other employees who work in, say, the parking shop upstairs at Peggy Middleton House...

I can just imagine them now, swanking into an industry party and schmoozing - the conversation might go like this:

1st Cool Meeja-Type with Square Glasses: "So - what do you do then?"

2nd Cool Meeja-Type with Square Glasses: (proudly) "I work for the Film Unit"

1st CMTWSG: "Oh yeah? Haven't seen you round Wardour St before..."

2nd CMTWSG (mutters something)

1st CMTWSG: "Sorry - didn't quite catch that.."

2nd CMTWSG: (coughs) I erm, work for um, Greenwich Council actually. (hurriedly) The Film Unit, natch..."

1st CMTWSG wanders off, looking for someone who actually works in the film industry...

Of course, I think it's a great idea to use Greenwich borough as a giant film set. It is, after all, a varied borough that has so many different aspects that you're bound to able to find somewhere that looks a bit like the place you want. A canteen on an oil rig, anyone? An American Naval college? Prague? No problem, Sir.

I am delighted that every time our borough gets used as someone else's background, our council tax gets supplemented. But by how much? And is it actually worth it?

A browse around Greenwich Council's film unit site will give you some idea of what they're offering to companies - including many empty buildings. WHY are they empty? Why aren't they being used? Some of these are residential houses - and quite-nice-looking ones too, which I suspect the council's own overstretched housing department might be intrested to know about...

It reads pretty desperate in places - playing "yes men" to anything a film company might demand - and believe me, they demand. You want to take over all our facilities? No problem. You want to suspend parking everywhere? Of course, Sir. A night shoot? We'll deal with the residents...

The fees seem ridiculously low, when you consider that these are multi-million dollar budgets we're talking about. Ok - the bottom end prices will be for photo-shoots and charity-cases, but even top-whack just doesn't seem very much. Is it really worth it for all the disruption and mess? I've worked on occasion for The Film Industry (note capital letters) and I can tell you - they don't give a damn about other people's lives or property.

Features. TV. Documentaries. Adverts. Music Videos... The list goes on and on.
Patriot Games. Tombraider. Portrait of a Lady. Dirty Pretty Things. About a Boy. The Four feathers. The Mummy Returns. American Girl.

I guess it's mild fun to spot the location as you're sitting in the cinema, especially given that they do their best to make us believe we're looking at anywhere else other than Greenwich. The council's argument for spending all that cash on having a Film Unit at all is to encourage business (paying bugger-all for the privilege, though I guess the local greasy spoon might sell a couple of extra bacon rolls) and tourism. Who's going to look at a film set in Prague and think "You know, I really fancy a holiday in South East London...?" And if they're trying to "promote the borough," they're not doing it very well - I asked the director of one of the very few movies actually set in Greenwich whether he'd used the GFU and he hadn't even heard of them.

When are we going to let Greenwich be - well - Greenwich? Layer Cake, Elizabeth, Popcorn and A Clockwork Orange (sort of but not really.) Oh - and Death in Greenwich, of course. Can anyone else suggest any other mainstream movies actually SET in Greenwich?

So - Greenwich Film Unit. A department I view with equal quantities of curiosity, derision and yet a strange sort of benevolence. Let's face it. It's not easy being cool when you're in local government.

I'll live with Greenwich Film Unit for now. I just wish they would show a little more dignity on the website. Respect is not something that the media gives out lightly and sucking up only makes it kick you harder.

Oh - and in case you're tempted by the idea of registering your house as a potential film set. Don't. Please don't. You will just end the relationship feeling used and dirty...

Labels: ,

16 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Filming is fine as long as the inconvenience is worth the reward. If Greenwich gets a free advert and lots of cash – fine. But please respect the people who have to live here!! I don’t want to be a ‘free’ extra in some film or advert and I am a little tired of Greenwich foot tunnel being closed for filming – this is a route that is used daily by people going to work – and for us cyclists (ok I’ve lost your sympathy now!) it’s the only practical way across the river. Interestingly the last time I know of it being closed for filming, the production company had to put on a free ferry. This short ride across the Thames was lovely, but I was home 30 minutes later than normal and would have preferred the tunnel being open. Now, I could be wrong, but I believe the council doesn’t have the right to close a public right of way (like the tunnel is) for filming, I wonder if this was pointed out to them, hence the ferry…
I am still wondering how much Greenwich gets for a days filming in the tunnel and is it worth the inconvenience to the people who use it daily.

30 March 2007 09:20  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

Don't worry about losing my sympathy - I'm absolutely NOT anti bike - I have one myself - just anti-antisocial behaviour and I'm sure you are an exemplary cyclist.

No - Greenwich Foot Tunnel is a public highway and HAS to remain open - hence the ferry (tee hee - must have cost them far more than the council's derisory rates.)

Sadly I don't think we do get either a free advert OR lots of cash - it's usually standing in for somewhere - no one would ever know it was filmed in Greenwich. And the rates - well -

If you want to see them for yourself you can find them at

http://www.greenwich.gov.uk/film/

30 March 2007 09:51  
Anonymous m32 said...

Wasn't the foot tunnel closed for the filming of 28 Weeks Later? At least it looks like quite a good film and is actually set in Greenwich (or at least bits of it). I don't really have a problem with filming in Greenwich, in fact I really support it, and it’s always fun to spot local locations in films, regardless of where they are supposedly 'set'. And it must be good for tourism. Hang on, ignore that, I don’t want more tourists....

Talking of films which could actually use Greenwich as Greenwich, it would be good to see an adaptation of Birdman by Mo Hayder. Does anyone else have any recommendations for books based here?

30 March 2007 12:56  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

OOOhh - interesting one. I'll have to do some delving. C.Day Lewis lived in Crooms Hill and wrote as Nicholas Blake about a mystery-solving poet called Nigel Strangeways. I'm told that some of the books are set there. The Worm Of Death is apparently set here. I'll see if I can get hold of a copy and report back...

30 March 2007 13:46  
Anonymous Marilyn said...

Went to see Amazing Grace at the Picture House this week and guess what.....lots of scenes filmed just outside the Painted Hall! Last summer they were shooting yet another period piece in the park, some chappie with a loud hailer had the cheek to try and stop me walking my dog. "We are filming, stop right there". "Well good for you, I am walking my dog". No notice that they were closing off half the park of course. I know its snippy but I take a perverse pleasure in being a grumpy old woman and marching on.

30 March 2007 23:36  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

Good for you, Marilyn. If the council can't be polite enough to let us know that they're shutting off our amenities for a paltry sum in the name of "art," then I don't see why you should have to be anything other than a thorn in the side of a film industry that thinks that just because some guy has a camera in its hand it is somehoe omnipotent.

Is Amazing Grace actually SET in Greenwich or is it just a pretty background?

30 March 2007 23:50  
Anonymous Marilyn said...

No, Amazing Grace isnt set here, just the usual bits of outdoor filming with lots of mud and straw strewn on the road to make it look authentic. I think it was meant to be in a spa town. Trouble is it takes your mind off the film as you keep watching the background. I did the same thing with The Mummy.

Talking about novels based on Greenwich I seem to remember The Rats was based here, for the life of me I cannot remember the author.

31 March 2007 22:39  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

Sounds as though it's "The Rats" by James Herbert. Looks a bit gruesome to me but may well get it out of the library - or a charity shop. There's always James Herbert books in chairty shops. There's probably an EU regulation that says that every charity shop must carry at least six of them.

01 April 2007 09:18  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

Was Amazing Grace not very good that you needed to take your mind off it?

01 April 2007 09:19  
Anonymous Marilyn said...

Amazing Grace was very good indeed, having read not very good reviews (and I refuse to take any notice of them now). I am ashamed to say I didnt know too much about Wilberforce (other than what 2 jags has had to say) prior to the film. Beautifully filmed and well acted. Rather spoilt by some idiot who commented rather loudly throughout most of it.
Nevertheless having our customary drink in The Rivington afterwards, in walked one of the actresses from the film - we did the cartoon double take, complimented her and had a chat. Oh I do love Greenwich!

01 April 2007 12:45  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

Is she local, then?

So the idiots who think that the world deserves to hear their pearls of wisdom throughout a film have invaded the Picturehouse then. I guess it was going to happen sometime.

01 April 2007 13:15  
Anonymous Marilyn said...

I didnt like to pry, but she was with an actor (can't place his name as yet) who seemed to know his way around the area. Terribly nice woman though, she said it was the first time she had seen the film all the way through.

As for the "constant chatterer", I told him at the end that he had rather ruined the film for us. He had obviously had a few too many and told me to mind my own business and that I was FAT (which I am not). Told him he was a drunken pig and was promptly hauled out by my friend, who is convinced that I will get a slap one day for speaking my mind.

01 April 2007 15:00  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

You depress me. Stay safe, eh...

01 April 2007 19:32  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's filming in Gloucester Circus as I type. The usual suspension of parking bays etc but they're polite and the area does look wonderful in the sun.

19 April 2007 13:33  
Blogger The Greenwich Phantom said...

Aaah. Well - if it's not harming anyone, I guess it's ok. Do you know what it's for?

19 April 2007 14:01  
Blogger Hopballehus said...

Speaking as a line producer, local council film officers are great - and are just as much a part of the industry as the trendy Soho post house types. Fees charged by local councils are proportional to your budget - if you're making a multi-million pound feature and demanding multi-bay suspensions, road closures etc. etc. you pay for it - handsomely - as you should do.

But if you're sending out a small crew to do a day's hand-held filming, don't want to close anywhere off, are prepared to work round the public, you pay a lot less.

Greenwich Park, by the way, is not under the Greenwich Council film unit but the Royal Parks one.

11 September 2008 13:50  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home